Reports and commentary on the news, science, and creative ends of the media.

Contact:
info-AT-farrellmedia-DOT-com

Subscribe to our Atom Feed.

My Most Recent Book

Official Book Site

HOME

MEDIA LOG
ARTICLES
FICTION
MOVIES
ABOUT...

VIDEO ARCHIVE

Blogroll:
NielsenHaydens
Scott Carson
John Wilkins
Cosmic Variance
Mark Shea
Steve Matheson
Andrew Sullivan
Bill Vallicella
Darwin Catholic
Massimo Pigliucci
Mike Flynn
Boston Online
James Chastek
Larry Moran
Jay Fitzgerald
Amy Welborn
Edward Feser
Siris
Mike Liccione

follow ofearghailDV at http://twitter.com

Archives
March 2002 April 2002 May 2002 June 2002 July 2002 August 2002 September 2002 October 2002 November 2002 December 2002 January 2003 February 2003 March 2003 April 2003 May 2003 June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 September 2003 October 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January 2004 February 2004 March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009 February 2009 March 2009 April 2009 May 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 September 2009 October 2009 November 2009 December 2009 January 2010 February 2010 March 2010

 
Detailed techy interview with Jonathan Rentzsch, an independent Mac programmer with his take on what's next for Apple and how he pitches his tools to clients, large and small.
posted by John Farrell at 8:54 AM

 
Son of Da Vinci Code? Great. Another hack novel in the works...

Wilson said he wants to write a novel about his theory. The forger or perhaps forgers, Wilson theorizes, probably robbed a grave and pulled the aged shroud off a body, then crucified someone to obtain the blood and study the wounds of Jesus.

"Most likely it involved some real wicked people," Wilson said.

Real wicked.
posted by John Farrell at 10:45 AM

 
Who Needs Sci-Fi Dept.

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A 70-million-year-old Tyrannosaurus rex fossil dug out of a hunk of sandstone has yielded soft tissue, including blood vessels and perhaps even whole cells, U.S. researchers reported on Thursday.

Paleontologists forced to break the creature's massive thighbone to get it on a helicopter found not a solid piece of fossilized bone, but instead something looking a bit less like a rock.

Full article.
posted by John Farrell at 5:41 AM

 
Things are getting a little...er, testy over at National Review's Corner...
posted by John Farrell at 3:43 PM

 
Revising Gregor Mendel?

Challenging a scientific law of inheritance that has stood for 150 years, scientists say plants sometimes select better bits of DNA in order to develop normally even when their predecessors carried genetic flaws.

The conclusion by Purdue University molecular biologists contradicts at least some basic rules of plant evolution that were believed to be absolute since the mid-1800s, when Austrian monk Gregor Mendel experimented with peas and saw that traits are passed on from one generation to the next. Mendelian genetics has been the foundation of both crop hybridization and the understanding of basic cell mutations and trait inheritance.

Full article.
posted by John Farrell at 3:40 PM

 
Why I'm not going Wireless anytime soon... (registration required)
posted by John Farrell at 6:48 AM

 
Uh-oh Dept. You mean, I may have to re-encode all my movies??? News on the future (or lack thereof) of the DVD format.
posted by John Farrell at 8:50 AM

 
More follow up on Da Vinci Code and the Vatican from today's Publisher's Lunch:

Another Prominent Catholic Is Softer On CODE
Monsignor Jose Maria Pinheiro, nominated to be bishop of Sao Paulo just two weeks ago, has adopted a softer position on THE DA VINCI CODE than the Vatican-appointed antagonist Cardinal Bertone.

Pinheiro said "I would recommend prudence. "It is important to talk to young people about it so that they can differentiate, but I don't think it's necessary to ban its reading."

Separately, USA Today looks at some of the wave of books positioned as "the next DA VINCI CODE," focusing on The Geographer's Library by Jon Fasman, Improbable by Adam Fawer, The Third Translation by Matt Bondurant, Map of Bones by James Rollins, and The Historian by Elizabeth Kostova.

I think the Monsignor is right. This wave is going to take some time to pass. Better to just ride it out.



posted by John Farrell at 2:20 PM

 
According to Publisher's Lunch newsletter:

Vatican Joins in Decoding Da Vinci
The DA VINCI CODE is just a work of fiction, but the Vatican is taking its worldwide popularity seriously enough that it has appointed Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, the Archbishop of Genoa and one of potential candidates to be the next Pope, to counter what the church calls the book's "shameful and unfounded errors."

The Cardinal told an Italian newspaper "There is a very real risk that many people who read it will believe that the fables it contains are true. [Dan Brown] even perverts the story of the holy grail, which most certainly does not refer to the descendants of Mary Magadalene. It astonishes and worries me that so many people believe these lies." He will convene the first in a series of public debates in Genoa tomorrow.

Doubleday replies in a statement: "The ideas put forth in THE DA VINCI CODE have been circulating for centuries; this novel explores them in an accessible work of fiction. Doubleday certainly respects Cardinal Bertone, the Vatican and their desire to clarify any factual errors they feel may have been made in THE DA VINCI CODE."

Great. This will guarantee Dan Brown's book will be on the best-sellers' lists for another year.

posted by John Farrell at 10:24 AM

 
Asleep at the Wheel Dept. Hans Bethe, the last of the great European physicists to flee Hitler and help develop atomic power in the U.S, died yesterday at age 98. He won the Nobel prize for showing how, in a step by step process, the sun fuses hydrogen into helium.

And what makes the front page of today's Boston Globe instead? An angry family demanding $740,000 from NStar because their dog got accidentally electrocuted at one of NStar's lamppost sites.

Hans Bethe: page D14. Dead dog: p. 1.

Who. Is. Running. This. Newspaper???
posted by John Farrell at 6:28 AM

 

Apple's successes in the sciences is not just about the hardware. Mac OS X has played a large role converting scientists and will continue to do so. Kerr is a featured speaker at the upcoming Bio-IT World Conference & Expo where she will talk about the benefits of Mac OS X Tiger.

Complete article here.
posted by John Farrell at 10:58 AM

 
Stanislaw Lem, the internationally renowned science fiction writer, notorious among American fans for bashing the genre as "a hopeless case, with exceptions," has been shortlisted for the first International Booker Prize for literature.
posted by John Farrell at 3:36 PM

 
Jay Fitzgerald quotes me on Jeremey Allaire's intriguing new idea for video delivery over the Internet.

Update:
More on Brightcove from Om Malik with commentary....
posted by John Farrell at 9:21 AM

 
I've always thought not enough attention was paid to Apple's potential in the Server market:

Yet despite significant efforts by Windows suppliers, Apple still remains a dominant player in vertical market segments such as publishing and digital media. And with the growing popularity of its low-cost Xserve Unix servers, Apple has an opportunity to compete head-to-head with industry leaders like Dell Inc. inside the data center for general-purpose applications such as e-mail and Web serving.

Full article.
posted by John Farrell at 2:51 PM

 
Agent/author Richard Curtis has a superb overview on the publishing industry:

Had the plethora of mergers and acquisitions that shrank the number of publishers to a handful of behemoths achieved a literary renaissance, perhaps we could rationalize that it was worth all the turmoil. But it did not. After each consolidation the patient continued to hemorrhage. It became obvious that gigantic publishers hemorrhage the same way that tiny ones do; it�s just that gigantic publishers have more blood to lose and the losses can be disguised in the financial reports of their parent companies. Like many a dying patient, publishers have lived in denial about the underlying cause of their chronic losses. Yet, the reason has been in plain sight all along: the returnability of books is killing the business.

Fear of provoking Federal antitrust prosecution inhibited publishers from combining to combat the practice of returnability, even though it was draining the vitality of the industry. What was worse, the vested interests of the retail bookstore business insured that the system would never change. Powerful chain store entrepreneurs shrewdly recognized that returns are a form of currency and found a way to systematically manipulate them. Instead of paying cash for new titles, the chains simply returned slow-moving stock and applied the credit toward the purchase. No money changed hands � just paper.

Read all of it here.
posted by John Farrell at 12:47 PM